WebP vs AVIF
Side-by-side comparison, when-to-use-each guide, and instant conversion. Reviewed for 2026.
Maximum compatibility (everything since 2020).
Cutting-edge optimisation (2024+) — most browsers, smallest files.
| Aspect | WebP | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2010 | 2019 |
| Compression vs JPEG | ~25-35% smaller | ~50% smaller |
| Compression vs WebP | — | ~30% smaller |
| Encode speed | Fast | Slow (build time) |
| Browser support | Universal | 95%+ (early 2024 onwards) |
Frequently asked
Should I switch to AVIF now?
Yes, with WebP and JPEG fallback via HTML <picture> tag. AVIF support is now broad enough that the bandwidth saving is worthwhile. The slow encode is a build-time cost, not a serving cost.
What about JPEG XL?
Technically superior to both WebP and AVIF, but Chrome dropped support in 2022 (and has only recently signalled a return), so support is still patchy. Until that settles, it's a risky choice for mainstream web. AVIF remains the safer next step.
Frequently asked questions
Should I switch to AVIF now?
Yes, with WebP and JPEG fallback via HTML <picture> tag. AVIF support is now broad enough that the bandwidth saving is worthwhile. The slow encode is a build-time cost, not a serving cost.
What about JPEG XL?
Technically superior to both WebP and AVIF, but Chrome dropped support in 2022 (and has only recently signalled a return), so support is still patchy. Until that settles, it's a risky choice for mainstream web. AVIF remains the safer next step.