WebP vs AVIF
Side-by-side comparison, when-to-use-each guide, and instant conversion. Reviewed for 2026.
Maximum compatibility (everything since 2020).
Cutting-edge optimisation (2024+) — most browsers, smallest files.
| Aspect | WebP | AVIF |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2010 | 2019 |
| Compression vs JPEG | ~25-35% smaller | ~50% smaller |
| Compression vs WebP | — | ~30% smaller |
| Encode speed | Fast | Slow (build time) |
| Browser support | Universal | 95%+ (early 2024 onwards) |
Frequently asked
Should I switch to AVIF now?
Yes, with WebP and JPEG fallback via HTML <picture> tag. AVIF support is now broad enough that the bandwidth saving is worthwhile. The slow encode is a build-time cost, not a serving cost.
What about JPEG XL?
Technically superior to both WebP and AVIF, but Chrome dropped support in 2022. Without Chrome, it's not viable for mainstream web. The momentum is firmly behind AVIF as the next standard.
Frequently asked questions
Should I switch to AVIF now?
Yes, with WebP and JPEG fallback via HTML <picture> tag. AVIF support is now broad enough that the bandwidth saving is worthwhile. The slow encode is a build-time cost, not a serving cost.
What about JPEG XL?
Technically superior to both WebP and AVIF, but Chrome dropped support in 2022. Without Chrome, it's not viable for mainstream web. The momentum is firmly behind AVIF as the next standard.